% PBN 2.1
% EXPORT
%Content-type: text/x-pbn; charset=ISO-8859-1
%Creator: BridgeComposer Version 5.98
%Created: Tue Oct  4 16:56:30 2022 +0200
%BCOptions Float GutterH GutterV ShowHCP STFixedPitch
%BidAndCardSpacing Thin
%BoardsPerPage fit,2
%CardTableColors #c0c0c0,#000000,#000000
%DDAFormat 0
%DefaultPagination 0
%EventSpacing 8
%Font:CardTable "Arial",11,700,0
%Font:Commentary "Calibri",10,400,0
%Font:Diagram "Calibri",8,400,0
%Font:Event "Calibri",10,700,0
%Font:FixedPitch "Courier New",12,400,0
%Font:HandRecord "Arial",11,400,0
%GutterSize 200,200
%HRTitleDate 0
%HRTitleEvent ""
%HRTitleLogo "logo.jpg"
%HRTitleSetID ""
%HRTitleSetIDPrefix ""
%HRTitleSite ""
%HtmlClubs entity,"http://bridgecomposer.com/suitimg/c.gif"
%HtmlDiamonds entity,"http://bridgecomposer.com/suitimg/d.gif"
%HtmlHearts entity,"http://bridgecomposer.com/suitimg/h.gif"
%HtmlNavBar 0.75,#cfe2f3
%HtmlSpades entity,"http://bridgecomposer.com/suitimg/s.gif"
%Margins 300,300,300,300
%PageFooter:0,2 "%n / %N"
%PageFooter:1,2 "%f - %e"
%PaperSize 1,0,0,2
%ParaIndent 0
%PipColors #000000,#ffa0a0,#ffa0a0,#000000
%PipFont "Cards Decorative Filled","Cards",0,0x53,0x33,0x34,0x43
%ScoreTableColors #e6e6e6,#000000
%SelectedBoard 0
%ShowBoardLabels 2
%ShowCardTable 2
%TSTCustomSortOrder Default
%TSTReport List
%TSTReportOrder ByNumber
%TSTReportShade Yes
%Translate "Board %" "Spel %"
%Translate "% Deals" "% gever"
%Translate "% Vul" "%"
%Translate "North" "Noord"
%Translate "East" "Oost"
%Translate "South" "Zuid"
%Translate "West" "West"
%Translate "None" "Niemand"
%Translate "N-S" "N-Z"
%Translate "E-W" "O-W"
%Translate "Both" "Allen"
%Translate "J" "B"
%Translate "Q" "V"
%Translate "K" "H"
%Translate "A" "A"
%Translate "NT" "SA"
%Translate "Pass" "pas"
%Translate "Dbl" "dbl"
%Translate "Rdbl" "rdbl"
%Translate "All pass" "allen passen"
%Translate "by" "door"
%Translate "Trick" "slag"
%Translate "Lead" "uitkomst"
%Translate "2nd" "2e"
%Translate "3rd" "3e"
%Translate "4th" "4e"
[Event ""]
[Site ""]
[Date ""]
[Board "1"]
[West "E.Culbertson"]
[North "Lenz"]
[East "J.Culbertson"]
[South "Jacoby"]
[Dealer "S"]
[Vulnerable "None"]
[Deal "S:2.AKJ42.J932.T95 T984.QT.QT4.K863 AKJ5.8753.K765.4 Q763.96.A8.AQJ72"]
[Scoring ""]
[Declarer "S"]
[Contract "4H"]
[Result "10"]
{Culbertson: On this first deal of the first rubber, Lenz, either failing to
recognize the values in his hand opposite an opening bid by his partner, or
being fearful that his system of valuation was faulty, underbid in not raising
his partner's declaration immediately to game. Although Jacoby had opened on a
bare minimum, he himself boldly bid for a game which can be made against any
defense, his aggressiveness again saving the situation for our opponents.\n
}
[BCFlags "1f"]
[Description ""]
[DoubleDummyTricks "76a9576a956733767337"]
[HomeTeam "Team 1"]
[OptimumScore "NS 420"]
[ParContract "NS 4H="]
[Room "Open"]
[Score "NS +420"]
[VisitTeam "Team 2"]
[Auction "S"]
1H Pass 3H Pass
4H AP
[Play "W"]
ST SA S3 S2
*
[OptimumResultTable "Declarer;Denomination\2R;Result\2R"]
N NT  7
N  S  6
N  H 10
N  D  9
N  C  5
S NT  7
S  S  6
S  H 10
S  D  9
S  C  5
E NT  6
E  S  7
E  H  3
E  D  3
E  C  7
W NT  6
W  S  7
W  H  3
W  D  3
W  C  7

[Event ""]
[Site ""]
[Date ""]
[Board "2"]
[West "E.Culbertson"]
[North "Lenz"]
[East "J.Culbertson"]
[South "Jacoby"]
[Dealer "W"]
[Vulnerable "NS"]
[Deal "W:AQ7.K32.2.KQJT95 5432.QJT.J543.86 KJ8.7654.AK86.74 T96.A98.QT97.A32"]
[Scoring ""]
[Declarer "W"]
[Contract "5C"]
[Result "11"]
{Culbertson: Our bidding of this hand is an example of the distributional
inferences that can be made from the Approach-Forcing conventional notrump
responses to an opening suit bid of one, together with repeated rebids of the
original suit to show length. We finally arrived at a safe game in a minor, scoring
also 100 for honours, instead of playing at notrump, at which, due to
distribution, game was not as safe as at a suit.\n
}
[BCFlags "1f"]
[DoubleDummyTricks "2445224452a998ba998b"]
[OptimumScore "EW 430"]
[ParContract "EW 3N+1"]
[Room "Open"]
[Score "EW +400"]
[Auction "W"]
1C Pass 2NT Pass
3C Pass 3NT Pass
5C AP
[Play "N"]
HQ H4 HA H2
HT H5 H9 HK
D3 DA D7 D2
D4 DK D9 H3
C6 C4 C2 CK
C8 C7 CA CQ
*
[OptimumResultTable "Declarer;Denomination\2R;Result\2R"]
N NT  2
N  S  4
N  H  4
N  D  5
N  C  2
S NT  2
S  S  4
S  H  4
S  D  5
S  C  2
E NT 10
E  S  9
E  H  9
E  D  8
E  C 11
W NT 10
W  S  9
W  H  9
W  D  8
W  C 11

[Event ""]
[Site ""]
[Date ""]
[Board "3"]
[West "E.Culbertson"]
[North "Lenz"]
[East "J.Culbertson"]
[South "Jacoby"]
[Dealer "E"]
[Vulnerable "EW"]
[Deal "E:965.JT83.J.J6532 J87.65.965432.87 KQT4.AK94.AKT8.Q A32.Q72.Q7.AKT94"]
[Scoring ""]
[Declarer "S"]
[Contract "3D"]
[Result "6"]
{Part-Score: N/S 60 - Jacoby: This hand greatly pleases me as an example of a
new type of psychic invented by me on the spur of the moment. It will be noted
that the opponents were vulnerable and that we had a part-score of 60. The
only possible value of my hand could be realized if I could discard eight cards
and use the diamond straight flush to play Poker with. When E.Culbertson
opened the bidding with a spade and Lenz failed to show enough strength to double
negatively, I was certain that the opponents had a game. However, Lenz's
notrump showed certain values in his hand, and I immediately bid three diamonds,
knowing he could not take this as a slam try. This prevented E.Culbertson from
showing his four-card heart suit, and he did not double, as he preferred to
defend a diamond contract to a likely rescue in clubs. Had I passed Lenz's one
notrump or bid only two diamonds, it is almost a certainty that the Culbertsons
would have arrived at a four heart bid, which was an absolute lay-down. As it
was, I saved the vulnerable game at a cost of 150 points.\n
}
[BCFlags "1f"]
[DoubleDummyTricks "433554336589a7889a78"]
[OptimumScore "EW 620"]
[ParContract "EW 4H="]
[Room "Open"]
[Score "NS -150"]
[Auction "E"]
Pass Pass 1S 1NT
Pass 3D AP
[Play "W"]
SK S2 S5 S7
CQ CA C2 C7
D8 D7 DJ D2
DT C4 C3 C8
HK H2 H3 H5
HA H7 H8 H6
H4 HQ HT S8
DK DQ S6 D3
DA C9 C5 D4
*
[OptimumResultTable "Declarer;Denomination\2R;Result\2R"]
N NT  4
N  S  3
N  H  3
N  D  5
N  C  5
S NT  4
S  S  3
S  H  3
S  D  6
S  C  5
E NT  8
E  S  9
E  H 10
E  D  7
E  C  8
W NT  8
W  S  9
W  H 10
W  D  7
W  C  8

[Event ""]
[Site ""]
[Date ""]
[Board "4"]
[West "E.Culbertson"]
[North "Lenz"]
[East "J.Culbertson"]
[South "Jacoby"]
[Dealer "W"]
[Vulnerable "All"]
[Deal "W:Q7653.QJ2.96.QT8 A2.T976.KQ432.54 JT98.543.85.J632 K4.AK8.AJT7.AK97"]
[Scoring ""]
[Declarer "S"]
[Contract "2NT"]
[Result "6"]
{Part Score: N/S 40 - Jacoby: This  hand definitely should have been played at
six diamonds despite the part-score. In my opinion Lenz should have responded
to my two notrump bid, which he knew incidentally to be a very strong one, by
a bid of four diamonds. Four diamonds must be absolutely safe, and he could
not have passed any more than he had. Over a four diamond bid I would naturally
have immediately bid six. \n
}
[BCFlags "1f"]
[DoubleDummyTricks "c9ccac9cca1411214112"]
[OptimumScore "NS 1440"]
[ParContract "NS 6N="]
[Room "Open"]
[Score "NS -200"]
[Auction "W"]
Pass Pass Pass 2NT
AP
[Play "W"]
HQ H6 H3 HA
H2 H7 H4 HK
HJ H9 H5 H8
*
[OptimumResultTable "Declarer;Denomination\2R;Result\2R"]
N NT 12
N  S  9
N  H 12
N  D 12
N  C 10
S NT 12
S  S  9
S  H 12
S  D 12
S  C 10
E NT  1
E  S  4
E  H  1
E  D  1
E  C  2
W NT  1
W  S  4
W  H  1
W  D  1
W  C  2

[Event ""]
[Site ""]
[Date ""]
[Board "5"]
[West "E.Culbertson"]
[North "Lenz"]
[East "J.Culbertson"]
[South "Jacoby"]
[Dealer "N"]
[Vulnerable "NS"]
[Deal "N:KQ76.754.T4.AQ87 A4.J93.J32.T6432 3.AQT862.AK65.K5 JT9852.K.Q987.J9"]
[Scoring ""]
[Declarer "S"]
[Contract "6H"]
[Result "10"]
{Gruenther: The outstanding error on this hand was Lenz's raise of his
partner's game demand takeout when he held only three small trumps, His response
should have been two spades, and in this event it is extremely improbable that the
slam would have been reached.\n
}
[BCFlags "1f"]
[DoubleDummyTricks "c8caac8caa1503315033"]
[OptimumScore "NS 1440"]
[ParContract "NS 6N="]
[Room "Open"]
[Score "NS -200"]
[Auction "N"]
1C Pass 2H Pass
3H Pass 6H AP
[Play "W"]
SJ SK SA S3
D7 D4 D3 DA
D8 DT D2 DK
D9 H4 DJ D5
HK H5 H3 HQ
C9 C7 C2 CK
S2 H7 H9 HA
CJ CA C3 C5
S5 CQ C4 D6
*
[OptimumResultTable "Declarer;Denomination\2R;Result\2R"]
N NT 12
N  S  8
N  H 12
N  D 10
N  C 10
S NT 12
S  S  8
S  H 12
S  D 10
S  C 10
E NT  1
E  S  5
E  H  0
E  D  3
E  C  3
W NT  1
W  S  5
W  H  0
W  D  3
W  C  3

[Event ""]
[Site ""]
[Date ""]
[Board "6"]
[West "E.Culbertson"]
[North "Lenz"]
[East "J.Culbertson"]
[South "Jacoby"]
[Dealer "E"]
[Vulnerable "EW"]
[Deal "E:AKT652.65.T42.JT J8.AKT9842.AJ.KQ 73.Q7.KQ53.A9743 Q94.J3.9876.8652"]
[Scoring ""]
[Declarer "S"]
[Contract "4H"]
[Result "9"]
{Gruenther: Jacoby's three heart bid was a game demand declaration under the
"1-2-3" System. The requirement for making this bid in a major suit is 9
probable tricks, and, while Jacoby may have fallen very slightly beneath this
requirement, the violation was a minor one. Lenz's three notrump response was
proper. Jacoby's return to four hearts was obligatory, although from a double dummy
perusal of the hands, it will be noted that three notrump could be made
against any defense except the Opening lead of the deuce of diamonds. This is also a
three-bid in the Approach-Forcing System, but partner would probably pass, as
he does not have the strength necessary to raise, which, according to the
"Contract Bridge Blue Book," is 1 plus honour- or ruffing-trick.\n
}
[BCFlags "1f"]
[DoubleDummyTricks "85955859554848848488"]
[OptimumScore "NS 140"]
[ParContract "NS 3H="]
[Room "Open"]
[Score "NS -50"]
[Auction "E"]
Pass 3H Pass 3NT
Pass 4H AP
[Play "W"]
S7 S4 SK S8
S3 S9 SA SJ
H7 SQ S6 DJ
CA C2 CT CQ
C3 C5 CJ CK
HQ H3 H5 HA
*
[OptimumResultTable "Declarer;Denomination\2R;Result\1R"]
N NT 8
N  S 5
N  H 9
N  D 5
N  C 5
S NT 8
S  S 5
S  H 9
S  D 5
S  C 5
E NT 4
E  S 8
E  H 4
E  D 8
E  C 8
W NT 4
W  S 8
W  H 4
W  D 8
W  C 8
